Dante Unicast Delay Requests: Reduce PTP Multicast Safely
6 min read · Updated October 14, 2026 · AV network engineers, system technicians, FOH and monitor engineers, broadcast operators, venue technicians, integrators, and production managers
Understand Dante Unicast Delay Requests, confirm leader compatibility, enable followers safely, and verify clock stability under representative network load.
TL;DR — Dante clock followers normally use delay-request messages to measure network travel time to the clock leader. On supported devices, Unicast Delay Requests send those messages directly to the leader instead of using multicast, which can reduce multicast control traffic on large networks. Confirm that the current and possible leaders support the feature, enable it only on compatible followers, then test election, synchronization, audio, and recovery before acceptance.
What the setting changes
Dante devices use Precision Time Protocol timing messages so followers can align with the elected clock leader. Delay requests help a follower estimate how long timing messages take to cross the network. The default behavior uses multicast; the optional setting makes a follower send its delay requests to the leader by unicast.
| Setting | Traffic behavior | Operational consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Default delay requests | Followers send multicast delay requests | Simple compatibility, but control traffic grows with follower count |
| Unicast Delay Requests enabled | Each enabled follower sends requests directly to the leader | Less multicast delay-request traffic when every required device supports it |
| Mixed compatible network | Some followers use unicast and others remain multicast | Can be valid when support and leader behavior are documented |
| Unsupported leader path | Enabled followers cannot complete the expected exchange | Followers may fail to synchronize |
This setting changes clock-control transport. It does not convert Dante audio flows from multicast to unicast, replace IGMP configuration, fix congestion, or change the receiver audio latency setting.
Decide whether the network needs it
Leave the default in place when the network is small, healthy, and within its measured capacity. Consider Unicast Delay Requests when a large endpoint count creates meaningful multicast clock-control traffic or when the engineered design explicitly requires it.
Start from evidence: inventory device models and firmware, identify the current preferred and elected leaders, measure multicast traffic, and review clock events. Do not enable the option merely because the word “unicast” sounds more efficient.
The Dante clock leader guide explains election and external clock ownership. The network health guide explains how to baseline traffic and clock evidence.
Enable it with a compatibility gate
1. Inventory every possible leader and follower
Record device model, Dante interface generation, firmware, primary and secondary role, current clock status, and whether Controller exposes Unicast Delay Requests. Include devices that may become leader after a failure, not only the leader visible during setup.
2. Prove leader support first
Audinate's Controller guidance says the feature only needs enabling on followers, but the clock leader must support receiving the unicast requests. Check support by confirming the option is available for the device and by consulting current device documentation. If a possible leader does not support it, either keep followers on the default behavior or design and test a supported leader policy.
3. Change a controlled follower group
Save the known-good configuration and event baseline. Enable the setting on a small, representative group of compatible followers. Do not change leader priority, QoS, cabling, firmware, and delay-request mode in the same test window.
4. Verify synchronization and audio
Confirm each changed follower locks to the expected leader, remains stable, and passes identifiable audio. Observe clock status, offset history, event logs, packet errors, and multicast utilization under normal and peak load. Compare results with the baseline rather than relying on a momentary green status.
5. Test election and recovery
Remove or disable the current leader at an approved boundary. Confirm a supported replacement is elected and every enabled follower resynchronizes without an unacceptable mute or repeated warning. Restore the original leader, wait for stability, and repeat on redundant primary and secondary paths when applicable.
Diagnose failure patterns
| Evidence | Likely issue | Next controlled check |
|---|---|---|
| Changed followers lose sync immediately | Current leader may not support unicast requests | Revert that follower group and verify leader capability |
| Normal state passes but leader failover fails | A possible replacement leader is incompatible | Test each eligible leader independently |
| Only one device fails | Firmware, device support, or local path differs | Compare it with a known-good follower of the same role |
| Multicast load barely changes | Delay requests were not a meaningful share of traffic | Recheck the measurement and leave default behavior if appropriate |
| Clock warnings continue | Root cause is elsewhere in the timing or network path | Follow the clock-event and offset evidence |
| Secondary network behaves differently | Support, firmware, or topology differs between paths | Audit both networks as separate failure domains |
Do not raise audio latency to conceal clock instability. Receiver latency protects media playout from late audio packets; it does not repair an incompatible PTP exchange.
Acceptance checklist
- Every current and possible clock leader has documented support.
- Every changed follower has compatible firmware and exposes the setting.
- A known-good configuration and clock-event baseline are saved.
- Changed followers lock and remain stable under representative load.
- Real audio passes to every critical destination.
- Multicast utilization is measured before and after.
- Leader loss, election, restoration, and redundant-path tests pass.
- The rollback procedure restores the previous behavior.
- Ownership and the accepted device list are recorded.
If a test produces warnings or unlocks, use the Dante clock sync troubleshooting guide before expanding the change.
Document the clock-control decision
Record why the option is needed, device and firmware inventory, enabled followers, eligible leaders, baseline and post-change utilization, clock events, offset evidence, failover results, owner, and rollback point. A future technician must be able to distinguish an intentional mixed configuration from an incomplete rollout.
In Techrider.live, keep the decision beside the digital-audio network notes and patch. Invite the system engineer to edit the same rider, save the accepted revision, inspect history, and export a PDF for the venue or touring handoff.
FAQ
What are Unicast Delay Requests in Dante?
They make an enabled clock follower send PTP delay-request messages directly to the clock leader instead of sending them as multicast. They affect clock-control traffic, not the transport type of audio subscriptions.
Should I enable Unicast Delay Requests in Dante?
Enable them only when measured scale or a documented network design justifies the change and all required leaders and followers are compatible. A healthy small network usually does not need the extra configuration.
Which Dante devices need Unicast Delay Requests enabled?
Only compatible followers need the option enabled. The current and every possible replacement clock leader must still support receiving the requests.
Can Unicast Delay Requests stop Dante clock sync?
Yes. Audinate warns that enabling the feature on followers while the clock leader does not support it may prevent those devices from synchronizing.
How do I test Dante Unicast Delay Requests?
Baseline the network, change a small follower group, verify clock and audio under load, force an approved leader election, test recovery and redundant paths, then compare multicast utilization and event evidence with the baseline.
Related guides
What Is a Stage Plot? (And How to Read One)
A stage plot is a top-down map of your band's stage setup. Learn what goes on it, how it differs from an input list and tech rider, and what makes one engineer-readable.
6 min readBasicsWhat Is a Tech Rider? (Sections Explained)
A tech rider is the full technical package a band sends a venue — console, monitors, PA, backline, power, stage plot, input list, hospitality. Learn every section.
7 min readBasicsStage Plot Symbols & Legend Explained
A visual glossary of stage plot symbols — mics, DI boxes, wedges, IEM packs, drums, amps, keys, power drops. Learn what each icon means and how to read any stage plot.
7 min read